MI was born into a cult.
Read all about it on:
Aesthetic Realism is a cult.
Whole Foods Boycott?After WF CEO John Mackey wrote an op-ed piece for the Wall Street Journal decrying the administration's proposed healthcare reform, progressives called for a boycott, and Boycott Whole Foods Facebook group got nearly 13,000 members in just a few days. But I'm not so keen on a boycott. For starters, where would boycotters shop instead? I doubt there is some other grocery near most people which is the very embodiment of progressive utopia in a way that Whole Foods isn't. And even with all of WF's questionable practices, and their CEO's extreme Libertarian views, WF is still likely the most progressive grocery chain around. Another reason to question a boycott was provided by The Daily Sift: "In the ideal boycott, you temporarily stop doing business with an organization until they change some particular practice. The classic example is the Montgomery Bus Boycott that ended the segregation of city buses. But a boycott is on shakier ground when you're trying to punish somebody for their personal political beliefs rather than what their organization does. The worst example in recent years was the campaign to get radio stations not to play songs by the Dixie Chicks after one of them told an English audience that she was ashamed of President Bush." On a related note, many of the boycotters have pledged that they will "never shop at Whole Foods again". But that's not a boycott. A boycott is a temporary cessation of business in order to get a company to change something. If someone pledges never to shop at WF again, what exactly is their goal? What do they hope to change, and how do they think their actions will support that change? And while we likely won't change the CEO's political views no matter how many of us boycott, there's a lot we can do to keep Whole Foods honest, whether we shop there or not. Indeed, Mackey has a long history of taking Whole Foods in a better direction after (polite but firm) lobbying for such. Let's focus on that. If you liked this page, you'll go frickin' nuts over my other work: 
Everything you wanna know. Shows you exactly how much you can save. (Visit now...) Which battery is best? We cover
rechargeable and alkaline batteries to show you what's hot,
what's not, and the best way to charge them. (visit
now) |
Whole Foods Market: What's wrong with Whole Foods?However, many of Whole Foods' actions have been controversial and sometimes even illegal, especially where its labor practices are concerned. WFM is so fiercely anti-union that it's (illegally) fired workers who were trying to organize one. And as Common Dreams said, "A closer look at the company's business practices and Mackey's ideas about business and society reveals a vision not that different from a McDonald's or a Wal-Mart. In fact, the Whole Foods business model is more or less the standard stuff of Fortune 500 ambition. This is a vision of mega-chain retailing that involves strategic swallowing up (or driving out of business) of smaller retail competitors. It is a business model that objectively complements the long-term industrialization of organics (that is, large-scale corporate farms) over small family farms. It is also a vision in which concerns about social responsibility do not necessarily apply where less publicly visible company suppliers are concerned. Subsidiaries of cigarette manufacturers (for example, Altria, owner of Kraft's organic products) or low-wage exploiters of minority workers (such as California Bottling Co., Inc., makers of Whole Foods's private-label water) are apparently welcome partners in this particular eco-corporate version of 'the sustainable future.'" I'm not suggesting that anyone stop shopping at Whole Foods or boycott it (see sidebar at left). I just want consumers to realize that even a company that puts on a socially-responsible face doesn't always live up to its own hype. Below are seventeen questionable aspects of Whole Foods Market. (I'm not including that CEO John Mackey is a denier of anthropogenic climate change and that he opposes Obama's healthcare reform, because those are his personal opinions and unrelated to Whole Foods itself.) And when you get done with these, be sure to check out my summaries of dozens of media articles critical of Whole Foods. Business practices (1) Aggressive monopolization. Tons of independent co-ops throughout the country don't exist any more because Whole Foods bought them out. Whole Foods also absorbed all its significant competitors (Bread & Circus, Fresh Fields, Bread of Life, Merchant of Vino, Nature's Heartland, Food for Thought, Harry's Farmers Market, Mrs. Gooch's Natural Foods Markets; they also tried to buy Wild Oats). (2) They've thus created a near-monopoly in the natural foods grocery business. Consumers are better served by a diversity of stores, but Whole Foods has been trying to wipe out the competition—and has been quite successful at doing so. (2) Fierceless devotion to profit. No one objects to businesses seeking profit, when a business puts on a socially-responsible face, consumers expect that the company will put "Doing the Right Thing" above "Making More Money". That's not always the case at Whole Foods. As Common Dreams says, "A closer look at the company's business practices and Mackey's ideas about business and society reveals a vision not that different from a McDonald's or a Wal-Mart. In fact, the Whole Foods business model is more or less the standard stuff of Fortune 500 ambition. This is a vision of mega-chain retailing that involves strategic swallowing up (or driving out of business) of smaller retail competitors. It is a business model that objectively complements the long-term industrialization of organics (that is, large-scale corporate farms) over small family farms. It is also a vision in which concerns about social responsibility do not necessarily apply where less publicly visible company suppliers are concerned. Subsidiaries of cigarette manufacturers (for example, Altria, owner of Kraft's organic products) or low-wage exploiters of minority workers (such as California Bottling Co., Inc., makers of Whole Foods's private-label water) are apparently welcome partners in this particular eco-corporate version of 'the sustainable future.'" (2,5) (3) Bullying smaller competitors. Whole Foods has been trying to force many of its smaller competitors to hand over private sales and financial data about those smaller stores. Whole Foods already holds a massive advantage due to its size, but that's apparently not enough for them. As one of the harassed smaller groceries put it, "Allowing Whole Foods to look through all of our private information about how we operate and what our plans are for the future unfairly adds to their already large size and financial advantage. We've been able to build a successful local business being David against their Goliath, and we're happy to keep doing that, but we do object to having one hand tied behind our back." (19) (4) Lying about humane standards. According to one farmer, a WFM-approved slaughterhouse failed WFM's inspection for cattle since its stun gun wasn't working properly, but WFM continued to use that slaughterhouse for sheep. (So much for the supposed humane standards.) The farmer also said that WFM wanted him to ship his cattle to a slaughterhouse 1400 miles away, and would still label the beef "Local" despite this. (26) See "Misleading shoppers about its support of small farmers" below for another case of lying. Questionable products (5) Refusal to come clean on the use of GMO's and toxic chemicals in its products. "Whole Foods is still not fully transparent about the use of GMOs in store-brand products, and has ignored shareholder requests for information on the use of toxic chemicals in products like baby bottles that are sold in stores." (12) Activists protesting WFM's sale of GM foods outside a store were arrested, likely at WFM's behest. (Why else would the police be there?) Whole Foods also asked shareholders to vote against an activist resolution asking WFM to report about endocrine disruptors and other toxic chemicals in its products. (13) (6) Trying to let "organic" farms use ammonium nonanoate. Whole Foods used its vote on the National Organic Standards Board to support letting farmers use ammonium nonaoate. (Fortunately, they were outvoted.) (NY Times, 2012) (7) Refusal to carry only turtle-safe shrimp. When Earth Island Institute asked Whole Foods to carry only shrimp caught in nets certified to protect endangered sea turtles, Whole Foods flatly refused. (1) (8)
Selling "organic" food that possibly isn't.
Much of WF's private-label frozen fruits and vegetables come
from China, where organics are completely unregulated.
This means no government (theirs or ours) checks to make sure
that the farms are actually using organic methods. It's a
huge leap of faith to think that suppliers on the other side of
the world are truly supplying organics when they know that know
one is checking up on them, especially when China has had such a
long list of manufacturing controversies about contaminated
products. To top it off, Whole Foods uses the "USDA
Organic" seal even though the USDA isn't actually verifying that
the food is really organic, and they use product names like
"California Blend", when the California Blend was really made in
China. (21) And even for domestic
food, Whole Foods has been caught selling produce as organic
that is anything but. (25) (9)
Selling dangerous food. You might think that with
a company that champions healthy eating, anything in their store
would be safe to eat. You'd be wrong. Whole Foods
sold fish so toxic in mercury that one customer's blood levels
had to be reported to the Center for Disease Control. (17)
Whole Foods didn't start identifying potentially mercury-laden
fish in its California stores until the government forced them
to do so. Even then, a quarter of Whole Foods stores
failed to display proper signage as required by law. (18)
Labor issues (10) Anti-Union. Whole Foods is so fiercely anti-union it has actually fired employees who were trying to organize one. As Common Dreams says:
(11) Poor working conditions. Workers organizing for a union in Madison said, "The ridiculously high turnover rate, wages that are lower than the industry standard, pervasive lack of respect, constant understaffing, absence of a legally-binding grievance procedure, and other poor and unfair labor practices—all of which have led to widespread low morale—highlight the simple fact that workers ultimately have no say in the terms and conditions of their employment at any Whole Foods Market—not just Madison. Workers are not recognized or appreciated for their contributions. Instead, Whole Foods relies on worker apathy and lack of investment in their jobs to keep turnover high, and for the most part, wages, benefits, and other working conditions poor. This environment should be unacceptable for any workplace." (1) (12) Low Wages. Whole Foods has been widely criticized for keeping wages low. "Companies such as Whole Foods or other non-union chain competitors are paying many of their hourly employees what in late 1960s dollars would be equivalent to the minimum wage or below." (1) And they can certainly afford to pay more. Whole Foods stores bring in $800 per square foot in a year, double the industry average. (11) Controversy about suppliers (13) Failure to support farmworkers. When United Farm Worker activists passed out literature at an Austin Whole Foods Market, Whole Foods called the cops and had them arrested. Embarrassed by the public outcry, Whole Foods then promised to support the UFW's grape boycott, but then broke that promise when it moved the store a couple of blocks away, saying the agreement applied only to the old location. They also produced deceptive literature for their customers blasting the farmworkers group and describing farmworker conditions as being no problem at all. About this, the UFW says, "Several major cases have been tried in states such as North Carolina and Florida during recent years where it was found that workers were being kept by their employers in a state of virtual slavery. This is worlds away from the ideal and naïve (and disingenuous) information put out by Whole Foods." (3,4) (14)
Misleading shoppers about its support of small farmers.
Signs at Whole Foods Market say, "Help the Small Farmer --
Buying organic supports the small, family farmers that make up a
large percentage of organic food producers." What they're
not telling you is that while the number of family
farmers is a large percentage of the total, overwhelming
majority of organic output comes from corporate
farms. As Slate put it: "There are a lot of small,
family-run organic farmers, but their share of the organic crop
in this country, and of the produce sold at Whole Foods, is
minuscule." Slate also pointed out that Whole Foods has
pictures and profiles of small organic farmers in their stores,
but doesn't actually carry products from those farmers.
(14) One farmer complained that Whole Foods
claimed to sell its products, when in fact it never has.
(26) Corporate controversies (15) CEO posing as someone else on the Internet. For seven years, Whole Foods CEO John Mackey posted on the Yahoo Finance board about his company and its competitors while pretending to be someone else. By trashing rival Wild Oats, Wild Oats' stock price could drop and he could buy them out for less money. Mackey also had the gall to anonymously praise himself. ("I like Mackey's haircut. I think he looks cute!") (6) He didn't stop there: He also criticized specific employees, under the cover of anonymity. Daily Kos said of this, "The very idea of the founder and CEO of a major national corporation hiding behind a pseudonym to lambaste one of his own hourly wage earners on an online message board says something about the personal moral integrity of union-busting executives." (7) After being discovered, he was unrepentant, trying to justify his behavior in a long blog post, and making a point to say specifically that his actions weren't unethical. (8, 9) (16) Gagging shareholders. Whole Foods refused to let shareholders speak about shareholder resolutions at its annual meeting. "'Given that the annual shareholder meeting is the one time each year that top executives and directors have to show up and be accountable to shareholders, it is unconscionable for companies not to allow proponents to make a short statement in support of their proposals,' said Beth Young, senior research associate for The Corporate Library (TCL), which assesses corporate governance....'It also seems to flatly contradict the company's pledge to 'recognize everyone's right to be listened to and heard regardless of their point of view,'' Mr. Herbert told SocialFunds.com. 'Whole Foods should recognize that any company that presents itself as socially responsible, as it does, is an easy target for a cynical press and public when it fails to uphold reasonable standards of corporate practice.'" (15) (17) Obfuscating executive compensation. Forbes magazine says, "Media reports frequently tout Whole Foods' pay policy, which caps the chief executive's salary and bonus at 14 times the average worker's pay. The Wall Street Journal, Slate.com, Harvard Business Review and BusinessWeek have all mentioned the pay cap, generally in favorable terms. But they all omitted one thing: stock options." When you count stock options, Mackey really made close to $3 million, or eighty-two times the average workers' salary. Forbes continues, "Whole Foods manages to obscure Mackey's total pay package by ballyhooing the salary cap." A company is certainly entitled to pay its execs whatever it wants, but the issue here is that WF is deceptive about how much its execs actually receive, relative to the lower-paid workers. (16) See footnotes. All this not enough for you? I also have a separate page with summaries of dozens of media articles critical of Whole Foods Market (Google picks the ads, not me.)
|
