Saving Electricity home As seen in Newsweek, Forbes, NPR, the Christian Science Monitor, CNET, PC Magazine, InfoWorld, and everywhere else. About  
Rebates & Tax Credits
for U.S. consumers

Incentives for installing insulation and for buying energy-efficient appliances like refrigerators, washing machines, and air conditioners are often available from local and state governments and utilities. You can see what's available at DSIRE,, and Energy Star.

Related sites:

Home Power Magazine. All about renewable energy for the home.

No-Impact Man. Blog about a family striving to have no net impact. (i.e., What little they use, they offset.) Inspirational.

Off-Grid. News and resources about living without being connected to a utility company.

Mr. Electricity in the news:

"Michael Bluejay runs the outstanding Saving Electricity site that I've mentioned many times before." —J.D. Roth, Get Rich Slowly

Deep Green (book) by Jenny Nazak, 2018
Small Steps, Big Strides: Building Sustainability Habits at Home (book), Lucinda F. Brown, 2016
How much money you'll save with these common energy-saving strategies, Lifehacker, Sep. 28, 2015
Radio interview about saving electricity, Newstalk 1010 (Toronto), April 21, 2015
How much does your PC cost in electricity?, PC Mech, Nov 21, 2013
How Much Electricity Do Your Gadgets Really Use?, Forbes, Sep. 7, 2013
Can my bicycle power my toaster?, Grist, June 10, 2013
Six summer debt traps and how to avoid them, Main St, June 5, 2013
To convert to gas or electric?, Marketplace Radio (NPR), July 20, 2012
8 Simple Ways to Reduce Household Waste, Living Green Magazine, June 29, 2012
Why is my electric bill so high?, New York Daily News, Mar. 27, 2012
Fight the Power, CTV (Canada's largest private broadcaster), Mar. 23, 2012
How to Cut Your Electric Bill, Business Insider, Mar. 20, 2012
Tips to save energy when using your computer, WPLG Channel 10 (Miami, FL), Feb. 23, 2012
How long will it take an energy-efficient washer/dryer to pay for itself?, Christian Science Monitor, Oct. 29, 2011
10 Easy Ways to Lower Your Electric Bill, Forbes, August 23, 2011
18 ways to save on utility bills, AARP, July 9, 2011
How to Save $500 Worth of Energy This Summer, TIME magazine, June 28, 2011
Hot over the energy bill? Turn off the A/C, just chill, Chicago Tribune, June 24, 2011
Cool Site of the Day, Kim Komando (syndicated radio host), May 29, 2011
This calculator shows how much you spend washing clothes, Lifehacker, May 6, 2011
What you pay when you're away, WCPO Channel 9 (Cincinatti), May 5, 2011
Spotting energy gluttons in your home, Chicago Tribune (CA), Apr. 7, 2011
Walnut Creek author has tips for livng a thrifty life, Contra Costa Times (CA), Jan. 24, 2011
Do space heaters save money and energy?, Mother Jones, Jan. 10, 2011
Energy steps to take for a less pricey winter, Reuters, Nov. 10, 2010
Should you shut down your computer or put it to sleep?, Mother Jones, Nov. 1, 2010
Energy saving tips for fall, Chicago Tribune & Seattle Times Nov. 7, 2010
10 ways to save money on your utility bill, Yahoo! Finance, Oct. 2, 2010
Mr. Electricity Ranks Refrigerators & Electrical Wasters, Green Building Elements, Sep. 8, 2010
The case against long-distance relationships, Slate, Sep. 3, 2010
10 household items that are bleeding you dry, Times Daily (Florence, AL), July 27, 2010
Cold, hard cash, Kansas City Star, June 22, 10
Stretch your dollar, not your budget, Globe and Mail, May 18, 2010
Auto abstinence, onearth magazine, Winter 2010
2010 Frugal Living Guide,
Energy-saving schemes yield €5.8m in savings, Times of Malta, Dec. 20, 09
Four ways to reduce your PC's carbon footprint, CNET, Dec 2, 09
The day I hit the brakes, onearth magazine, Fall 2009
How Much Do You Really Save By Air-Drying Your Clothes?, The Simple Dollar, 2010
Enjoy the mild weather, low electricity bills, Detroit Free Press, Jul 18, 09
The most energy-efficient way to heat a cup of water, Christian Science Monitor, Jun 16, 09
Ten ways to save energy, Times of Malta, Jan 3, 09
Measuring your green IT baseline, InfoWorld, Sep 4, 08
Bald Brothers Breakfast (MP3), ABC Adelaide, March 27, 2007
Net Interest, Newsweek, Feb 12, 07
The Power Hungry Digital Lifestyle, PC Magazine, Sep 4, 07
Net Interest, Newsweek, Feb 12, 07
Answers to all your electricity questions, Treehugger, Jul 11, 08 Going Green, Monsters and Critics, Jan 6, 2007
A hunt for energy hogs, Wall Street Journal Online, Dec 18, 06

Battery Guide

Which battery is best? We cover rechargeable and alkaline batteries to show you what's hot, what's not, and the best way to charge them. (visit now)

Guide to Cheap Airfare

How to find the Cheapest Airfare.

Everything you wanna know.

(Visit now...)

Ben Folds Five

The rise and breakup of the world's greatest piano pop band.

(Visit now...)

How to Buy a House
How to
Buy a House

Step-by-step guide for first-time homebuyers.

Visit now...

"Power Factor" and devices that claim to save energy by fixing it

Last update: January 2010

NOTE: After writing the article below, a reader wrote in and claims to have measured savings with a power factor device through the only test that matters: clocking your electric meter. While I'm still skeptical, given the extreme reader interest in these devices, it's clear that I need to test one myself to put the matter to rest once and for all.  I won't have time to do so until 2011 at the earliest, but when I do I'll report the results here.  In the meantime, below is my position on power factor devices, until I see good evidence to the contrary.  And again, the only evidence that is acceptable is a before and after test, clocking the actual utility company electric meter each time.  Before-and-after electric bills are completely worthless for substantiating whether these devices really work or not.


Before I give the technical explanation about these devices, let me give you the summary: These devices won't save electricity in your home. Don't waste your money on them. They do correct your power factor, but utilities don't charge home users for bad power factor. You weren't paying a penalty before installing the unit, so you won't see any savings after you put it in.

Now, some commercial customers are billed for bad power factor, if their power factor is very bad. For those users it might make sense to install PF-correction equipment. But not home users.

Besides the fact that these things don't work for home users, there's something else about them that rubs me the wrong way: Many people are just looking for a quick fix, some device they can just buy and plug in so they don't actually have to make any effort to conserve energy. Please, let's move beyond that. Saving electricity really isn't that hard, and the amount of energy a household could save by not being wasteful is tons more than could be saved by one of these little plug-in devices, if they worked (which they don't). So let's stop pinning our hopes on tech scams and instead simply use less electricity.

Okay, so let's talk about "power factor".  Without getting too technical, sometimes more power goes into a device than you'd expect, because of a special kind of inefficiency.  The actual power used by your device is measured in kW, and that's what you're charged for.  If your device uses only 80% of the power going into it, the power factor is 80%.  Power factor is the Real Power (the amount your device actually uses) divided by the Apparent Power (the total going into it). For example, 80 kW (Real Power) ÷ 100 kVA (Apparent Power) = 80%.  And again, residential customers are charged only for the Real Power, not the Apparent Power.

There are a number of devices which increase the power factor or recycle the reactive power. What's more, this is supposed to make your equipment run cooler and last longer.  The devices either plug into an empty electrical outlet, or you have an electrician install it at the service panel.  But since home users aren't billed on power factor, there's no savings to be had.

And even if the utility billed home users for bad power factor, modern appliances already have this kind of power-correction built-in. For these appliances, there's nothing left to "correct".  Consumer Reports says the average American home already has a power factor of 90%, which would make the maximum savings close to only 10% (if the utility actually charged you for the power factor penalty, which they don't).

But what about saving energy for green reasons, even if it doesn't save any money?  Sorry, no dice.  The savings here is just very small.  It's actually less than you'd expect:  If your power factor is 90%, there is way less than 10% savings to be had.  Here's more info on that one.

A utility company employee writes:

I work for a utility in Ontario and we have tested these devices in our shop, and these devices are a scam for residential billed customers. They do correct the power factor but since residential customers are only billed on kw.h they do nothing to reduce a customer bill. That is loads use watts, and residential customers are billed on watts, so it doesn't matter what the PF is. Our tests not only proved this but that these devices actually use a small amount energy, which ironically drives the customer bill up.

PF only comes into play with larger commercial customers who are billed on Peak Demand. The theory is that customers use Watts and the utiltiy supplies VA, so for the same load (watts), the lower the PF the more the utility must supply in VA. To combat this the utility bills is the higher of Watts or 90%*VA, thus the customer is charged more for a low (bad) PF, thus they can reduce their demand charge by raising (or fixing) their PF. PF is lowered by inductive loads, thus adding capacitance raises it. These little expensive devices are just capacitors.

I read the white papers on these devices, and they did not report anything that was untrue, but the advertising is very misleading. Some of the technical people at our work were fooled, until it was explained and our results revealed.

Another writes:

Our residential meters don't measure reactive power.  You can't save money by plugging in a reactive power correction device.

Consumer Reports also confirms that residential users don't pay for bad power factor.

The proof of the pudding is in the eating

The websites for products like these extol supposed testimonials from residential customers, who are simply looking at their bill month over month. Frankly, that's a ridiculous way to evaluate whether the product works or not. Energy use from month to month can vary for all kinds of reasons. The only meaningful way to test one of these products is to clock the electric meter before and after the product is installed, with the same exact devices running in the house. That's the only kind of test I will perform, and that's the only kind of demonstration I'll accept.  Period.  (Yet clueless sales reps and customers keep offering to send me their electric bills, as though that wasn't completely useless.)

Power factor box manufacturers are always trying to impress me with alleged testimonials from their supposed customers. But in fact nothing could impress me less. Those customers almost certainly didn't do the proper kind of test, and I have no way of verifying their honesty anyway. In short, if I don't see it myself firsthand, I'm not buying it.

Some of them have videos showing some kind of meter connected that shows some kind of reduction. This is also the wrong test, because the question isn't whether the power factor is corrected, it's whether there's a reduction at your electric meter. Okay, so one of these companies has a video showing it connected to an electric meter -- sitting on a table! Not an actual electric meter in use, installed at the house. No one has ever produced a video of an actual installed residential electric meter showing a decrease in usage with one of these devices connected. Why on earth not, when it's an easy test to do, and when it's the best proof available?  Probably because the devices don't work.

Here's another thing: If these devices really worked, then companies would be falling all over themselves to get me to test them or to demo them for me so they could get the free advertising from me. I get several thousand visitors to this site every day, why wouldn't they want that? The fact that I don't hear from them in and of itself is telling. It's not because they don't know about this site. It's the #1 site on the net for saving electricity, has been mentioned in Newsweek, and frankly, if you're in the electricity-saving business, you know about it. Also, when a manufacturer writes to me to gush about how much energy their product saves, I say, Fine, send me one to test. And then I never hear from them again. I was going to link to the last manufacturer that happened with but I just tried to check their site and it crashed both my browsers.

For nearly ten years I had an open offer for manufacturers to send me their device to test, but no one ever took me up on it.  As of January 2010 I'm retiring this offer because I won't be able to test one until fall since I'm traveling, and at that point I'm just going to buy my own to test it.

By the way, last summer I went to the website of the most well-known power factor box maker, but I couldn't find any guarantee mentioned anywhere on the site. I called and they said they'd email it to me, but what I got was some barely literate rambling jargon that wouldn't pass as a guarantee in any court on this planet. I wrote back and asked if they'd agree to a simple statement (something like they "guarantee that the unit will reduce energy consumption as shown at the residential electric meter"), but they didn't write back. I called, we traded voicemails, but then after my last message I haven't heard from them.

My test of two different plug-in units shows that they don't work

One reader bought a unit and sent it to me to test, and I'm happy to do that, but realize that you can perform the same test yourself:

  1. Turn on everything in your home.
  2. Go outside and clock your electric meter. (See how fast it spins.)
  3. Plug in or install the power factor device.
  4. Clock your electric meter again.

Make sure that nothing changes before and after you install the device. That is, make sure the fridge doesn't kick in or cut off between meter readings. Was there a difference in how fast your electric meter spins? How much? If it spins 10% slower with the device installed then congratulations, you're saving 10%. But if there's no difference then you save...nothing.  (Okay, in theory these devices could use the same amount of power but for a shorter period of time, because they make your fridge and AC more efficient so the compressor can turn off sooner.  But that would be good for only those two devices, not anything else, and my test on a fridge showed that there wasn't even any savings there anyway.)

Gen Russell of Australia sent me an "A2 Intelligent Every Saver". Supposedly you just plug it in and save "up to 35%". So I turned on every light (fluorescents), the window AC units, the microwave oven, and cranked up the refrigerator. I went outside and clocked the electric meter to see how fast it was spinning. Then I went inside, plugged the A2 device into the wall, and went back outside to clock the meter again. No change. Let me repeat that: No change. Meaning I showed zero savings with this device plugged in.

The instructions for the device didn't say whether it had to be on the same circuit as the appliances, implying that any circuit was fine, but just in case, I plugged it into several different circuits. No difference, no savings.

Some years ago I bought a similar device from Home Depot called "EnergySmart PowerPlanner", which claimed to save up to 23% on my refrigerator's use, but which in my tests failed to save any energy at all. Later the CPSC issued a recall on many of these models for safety issues. Eventually the company went out of business.

When I heard about this device I repeatedly wrote to them asking for a unit to test, but I never heard back from them. Maybe they knew it didn't really work. So I finally just went out and bought one but couldn't measure any savings even when testing it on an ancient Whirlpool refrigerator. The device should have worked well since older fridges are much less efficient than newer ones. After 100 hours each with and without, the fridge actually used 9.6% more electricity when the device was installed. Looking at just how many watts the fridge is pulling when the compressor is running, the device dropped the load from 195 watts to 189 -- about a 3% reduction. Apparently the compressor had to run longer, which is why I used more electricity overall. Even if the compressor doesn't run longer, a 3% savings on a modern fridge would be about 15 kWh a year -- or $1.50. The device itself cost $30.  EnergySmart listed the results of "studies" on their website which purportedly proved their product works, but they provided nearly no data on the studies themselves (such as the age of the refrigerator that was used), much less a the full text of the study or even a link to the study's authors.  Chuck Wright tested the PowerPlanner and also failed to realize any meaningful savings.  Like most magic "plug-it-in-and-save" devices, this product seems like more hype than benefit.


Devices that claim to save energy by reducing surges also don't save squat. In short,

I know of NO device that will save household energy overall simply by plugging it in or installing it at the panel.

I'm certainly willing to revise my opinion if I can measure savings in a hands-on test, but until then, my position is that if you want to save energy, you do it the obvious way: use less.