Michael Bluejay's info & resources about | |||||
|
Why they're so high, and how to lower them Feb. 2004 This was written for ICC-Austin, but the discussion is applicable to most other multi-house co-op systems. |
To understand room rates, we first need to see where your money is going: (More details about this chart are in the Financial Training PDF document.) Those with little knowledge of or experience with central ICC planning often think that room rates are high for no good reason, and that either somebody is getting rich off us or that money is being squandered. I promise you that is not the case. Rates are high because of things like poor real estate investments in the 80's which we're still paying for and Arrakis burning down, things that are completely beyond our control today. Think about it: The board is made up of students from the houses, who are paying room charges just like everyone else. Doesn't it make sense that they would lower rates if they could? Or do we think that everyone who's been on the board for the last several years is just stupid for failing to lower rates when they could have easily done so? Let's assume I haven't convinced you yet and you think the board is stupid. Okay, fine, you're in charge. What would you cut? Let's have a look. Properties (Mortgages & Leases). Not-uh. We have to pay back our loans to the bank or they repossess the houses. And we have to pay our rent on HoC and Avalon or we get evicted. Let's look at staffing in more detail since it's our only option. To save on staffing costs, you basically have two choices: (1) Do some of the work yourselves and downsize staff, or This is one reason I've been banging the drum for expansion ever since I've been around ICC. It's one of the only ways to significantly impact room rates, if members don't want to do staff's work. Note that downsizing is not a panacea even if you can do it. Saving $34k on one position (salary + benefits + taxes), saves only $17/mo. off room rates. Significant, yes, but not the $50-$100/mo. that some people seem to think we're capable of somehow.
Put things into
perspective: When trying to cut the budget it's important to put things in perspective. Every $2000 you cut saves only $1/mo. in room rates. You can cut lots of little things which people will actually miss and still fail to meaningfully impact room rates. Last year a Senecan told me she wanted to get on the board so she could cut the fat from the budget and lower rates. She cited a $400 expense she thought was wasteful. I replied that that expense amounted to only $0.20/mo. of room rates. "Sure," she said, "but all those little things add up." But in fact they don't, not in a meaningful way. Cut four little programs totaling $2000 and you've saved a whopping $1/mo. off rates, while perhaps killing things such as scholarships, food for General Membership Meetings, and ICC t-shirts. It's not worth it.
Improve Occupancy to Lower Rates There's one more way to potentially lower rates: Get more people to live here. If ICC were completely full year-round then rates could be $68/mo. lower. That's the equivalent of firing two of your lowest-paid staffers or buying two more houses, the benefits of which wouldn't be seen for 20 years into the future. Summary I maintain that the only significant ways to lower room rates are: |
Michael Bluejay's info & resources about | |||||
|