Charging Alkaline Batteries
Charging alkaline batteries is not recommended
Last updated: June 2012
Five-year
cost
of charging a pair of NiMH vs.
Alkaline (AA size)
Assumes you go through a set of AA's every three
weeks.
|
|
NiMH
|
Alkaline
|
Charged with...
|
A real charger, like
any of the ones
mentioned above
|
Battery
Xtender
|
Cost per set of batteries
|
$12.63 inc. shipping
from Thomas Distributing
|
$1.89
|
Sets of batteries used in five years
|
1
|
29
|
Cost over five years
|
$12.63
|
$54.81
|
Assumptions: Two
batteries per set. Calculation for the Aklalines: Run down
most of the way before charging, so 12 charge cycles and a 200%
increase in battery life. Use of 1 fresh set every 3 weeks, or
52w x 5y ÷ 3w =86.7 fresh sets over 5 years. 86.7 fresh sets ÷ 3x
increase from charging means 28.9 sets used.
|
Charging alkaline batteries is not recommended,
even with so-called "rechargeable" alkalines in a special alkaline
charger. That's because:
- Charged alkalines give very few recharge cycles.
You'll get only a couple dozen of recharge cycles, maybe less. A
true rechargeable like an NiMH
can be
recharged hundreds or even thousands of times.
- Alkalines lose capacity every charge cycle.
That is, after every time you charge them, you get less and less run
time.
- Alkalines require constant topping-up. You
can run a NiMh or NiCd all the way without worry. But if you
drain alkalines too far then their cycle life plummets.
(Cycle life is the number of times a battery can be charged before it
won't charge any more.) So to get the best cycle life out of
alkalines, you have to constantly top them up, which is a real
pain.
- Alkalines designed to be rechargeable often have a
much smaller capacity than real alkalines—or even NiMH
rechargeables!
- Charged alkalines are much more likely to leak,
either inside the charger, or later inside your device. I hope it
wasn't an expensive device.
- There is not much good reason to charge alkalines in
the first place. You want to recharge your batteries?
Use NiMH. You need more
shelf-life
than a standard NiMH? Use low-self-discharge
NiMH. You need more voltage than NiMH? Use NiZn.
I can think of only one good reason to charge
alkalines: You have a stockpile of them, or easy access to
them. (For example, I have a friend who works in a hospital which
throws out tons of old alkalines, that he's able to score for
free.) He won't get many cycles out of these free batteries, but
hey, they're free.
Use a special charger
If you insist on charging your alkalines, you
absolutely have to use a special charger. You can't use a
NiMH, NiZn, or NiCd charger. It must
be designed specifically to handle alkalines. There are only a
few such chargers in existence. I cover most of them below.
Chargers that purport to charge standard
alkaline batteries
Some alkalines are designed to be recharged with a
special charger, but some chargers purport to let you charge even standard
alkaline batteries. I think that charging either kind of
alkaline is usually a mistake, but trying to charge standard
alkalines is a bigger mistake. They yield even fewer recharge
cycles, the voltage drops on each cycle, and I suspect that they're
even more susceptible to leaking
than rechargeable alkalines (though those leak too).
Note that high-drain alkalines designed for things like
digital cameras are especially resistant to charging.
Sierra Electric JB5411
I list this one first because as I write this in June 2012,
it's the only battery charger still on the market that purports
to charge standard alkalines.
Not that it's any better than the ones listed below.
The reviews on Amazon are simply devastating.
'nuff said.
Runtime of AAA after charging with each
charger
|
|
AccuManager
20
|
Battery
Xtender
|
Radio Shack NiMH (four different
pieces)
|
2:36
|
0:40
|
Lenmar NiMH (three different pieces)
|
2:42
|
0:55
|
Sony (two different pieces)
|
2:52
|
0:26
|
Conclusion
|
Very Good
|
Very Crap
|
Battery
Xtender
The Battery Xtender is absolute crap. It
purports to be an all-in-one charger, charging both
rechargeable and nonrechargeable batteries. So I first tested a
AAA
NiMH and it didn't even fill it one-third of the way
full! So I
ran some tests to see how much runtime I could get out of AAA batteries
after charging them with the Battery Xtender vs. a real charger, and my
results are shown at right. Each battery was tested at least
three times in
each charger.
In 19% of my tests, the
runtime on a battery charged with the
Battery Xtender was less than one minute! The battery ran out
almost immediately. But even if you tossed out all those cases, the
average runtime from the Battery Manager is still woefully low,
typically less than an hour.
As for alkalines, it has the same problem as all other
alkaline
chargers: very few recharge cycles, decreasing capacity every
cycle, and a high probability of leaking. The table at right
shows that over five years, you could easily spend more than four times
as much by charging alkalines as you would by simply using real
rechargeable batteries in the first place. And if you typically
burn through a set of batteries faster than once every three weeks, the
penalty for trying to charge alkalines is even greater.
Five-year
cost
of charging a pair of NiMH vs.
Alkaline (AA size)
Assumes you go through a set of AA's every three
weeks. |
|
NiMH
|
Alkaline
|
Charged with...
|
A real charger, like
any of the ones
mentioned above
|
Battery
Xtender
|
Cost per set of batteries
|
$12.63 inc. shipping
from Thomas Distributing
|
$1.89
|
Sets of batteries used in five years
|
1
|
29
|
Cost over five years
|
$12.63
|
$54.81
|
Assumptions: Two
batteries per set. Calculation for the Aklalines: Run down
most of the way before charging, so 12 charge cycles and a 200%
increase in battery life. Use of 1 fresh set every 3 weeks, or
52w x 5y ÷ 3w =86.7 fresh sets over 5 years. 86.7 fresh sets ÷ 3x
increase from charging means 28.9 sets used.
|
But it's not just that
it's a waste of money, it's a waste of time.
With the BatteryXtender you have to keep screwing around buying more
batteries, AND you have to constantly keep them topped off, rather than
just letting them run down like you would with NiMH's.
The user's manual says
as much. When you run down the
battery
most of the way before recharging you get only 12 charge cycles, and
only a 200% increase in overall battery life. That means that if you
got an hour's worth of run time without recharging, then with
recharging you'll get three hours overall. Why wouldn't it be 12 hours
if you're recharging 12 times? Because you have to charge before
the battery has run down, and because after every charge cycle the
battery capacity is less than it was before. So after
screwing
around with 12 charges you've only tripled your run time.
Of course, you can
recharge after just a little bit of use,
and thus get more charge cycles. If you let the battery run down
just a little bit before charging, then the manual claims you
can
get 180 charge cycles. Except that that represents only 16x total
run
time compared to a single battery. Which would you rather do to
get 16x
the run time of an original battery: charge a NiMH 16 times or charge
an alkaline 180 times?
The sad thing is, if
this charger simply charged NiMH's
properly then it would be a great charger, because then it could handle
everything. You could use it to charge the NiMH's you should be using,
and you could use it to charge the odd alkaline you have lying around
so they don't go to waste. But since it charges a NiMH less than
1/3 full, and since there's no point in charging alkalines when you can
get better performance and convenience out of NiMH's, there is really
little use for this charger.
Innovations
Battery
Manager
This is the
worst charger I've ever tested. It purports to charge alkalines
as well
as rechargeables. In fact, the alkalines I charged with it
frequently
leaked, either inside the charger or after they've been removed.
But
that's not the worst part, since the spill in the charger can mostly be
cleaned with rubbing alcohol and a cotton swab (unless the batteries
leaked in whatever device they were powering, ruining it). No,
the
worst parts are (1) It often refuses to charge NiCads (while these
NiCads charge fine in any of the four other chargers I own), and (2) it
can't even fill up a standard NiCad D battery! I'm not talking
high-capacity D, I mean not even a normal D! And the
insiduous
thing is, you'd never know! I used this charger for a couple of
years
before I tested it and found out it had been short-changing me on the
charge the whole time. Maybe the warning sign is that this unit
is sold
by Real
Goods,
who were fairly notorious for putting misleading descriptions in their
catalog (or for selling crap that just doesn't work right).
Someday I
may put their laughable responses to these problems on this
website. In
the meantime, here's a review from another
user who hated his Battery Manager.
Buddy L Super Charger / Emerson EBR444
The Buddy L Super Charger was released in 1993 and
didn't last long. (All About Batteries) Popular Mechanics tested it and found that the
first charge didn't revive alkalines back to their original 1.5V, but
rather only 1.38V. The second charge was worse—only 1.3V.
And it gets worse from there. From the pictures I've seen, the
Emerson EBR444 was the same unit with
a different name. I bought an EBR444 around 2000 and originally
gave it a poor
review here, but a
reader pointed out how I goofed in my testing. Doesn't really
matter, since it's not easily available anyway, and even if it were,
there's little point in charging alkalines, since you can only
charge them a dozen or so times (if you're lucky), vs. hundreds or
thousands of times for a real rechargeable like a NiCad or NiMH.
Also,
this unit doesn't recharge NiMH batteries at all, a pretty serious
drawback.
Homegrown alkaline battery charger
For the daring, here's one guy's plans for how to
make your own
alkaline battery charger. Definitely not recommended by me.
So-called "Rechargeable Alkalines"
Even alkalines that are designed to be recharged
have the same problems as standard alkalines:
few recharge cycles, decreasing capacity each cycle, and susceptibility
to leaking. So why did anyone even bother trying to make
rechargeable alkalines?
The answer is that we didn't use to have good choices for
rechargeable batteries. Until the early 2000s, your only
choice for a rechargeable AA or AAA battery was a NiCd,
which had very low capacity. They ran out so quickly that they
almost weren't worth using. They also had low shelf life and low
output voltage (think dimmer flashlights).
Today if you want long run-time, you've got NiMH. If you want longer
shelf
life you've got LSD NiMH.
And if
you want higher voltage you've got NiZn.
But in 1994 we had none of those things, and that's why Rayovac came
out with their Rayovac Renewal charger, designed to be used with their
special rechargeable alkalines. But then when newer, better
battery technologies came out, the Rayovac Renewal died big-time.
Here's a 1994 TV commercial for the Rayovac Renewal.
They boast about being able to charge the battery "25 times!"
That's nice, but a real rechargeable battery can be charged hundreds
of times.
Years ago I bought one of these to test. When I
get around to it, I'll post the photo of the horrible mess it made
inside the charger when one of the Renewal batteries leaked inside of
it.
I have some more information
about
rechargeable alkalines on
the Battery Types page.
|