How cults recruit and indoctrinate their members
by Michael Bluejay • Last update: December 2024
Ever wonder how someone becomes a cult member? How exactly do they get sucked in? The process is remarkably similar from cult to cult, and here I'll explain the basic recipe.
The first thing to understand is that the indoctrination is a series of small steps. If the cult’s pitch were, “Come join our group, cut off ties with friends and family who won’t join, and devote all your spare time to it for the rest of your life,” no one would ever join, they’d run the other way screaming. But the opening pitch isn’t a big ask, it’s something small like, “Come to this party,” or “Come to this art presentation.” The next ask will get the recruit in a little deeper, but it’ll also be close to the previous ask. And once the recruit has taken enough small steps they’re a mile from where they started.
Psychological research has shown that this actually works: when you make a big ask first, you’re unlikely to get it, so the trick is to make a small ask (relatively easy), and then once people have agreed, they’re likely to agree to the next ask, which is bigger than the first, even if they wouldn’t have agreed to that big ask right off the bat:
Now that you know that indoctrination is a series of steps, let’s see how a new recruit goes through those steps.
1. Invitation to a non-threatening event
As we saw above, cult recruiters never give you the hard sell right off the bat, because no one would sign up for that. Instead, they invite you to a workshop, a poetry reading, a "party", a performance, or some other seemingly innocuous event. After you agree to that, they keep leading you down the rabbit hole one small step at a time, so you never realize what’s happening.
The invitation might incorporate some other tricks. For example, famed ex-cult member Steve Hassan originally accepted the invitation from the Moonies because the Moonies used attractive young women as the recruiters.
2. Love-bombing
At the initial party or event, cult members shower the potential recruit with attention and praise. Psychologists call this "love-bombing". The cult people are trying to create a positive association in your mind between attending the event and having a good feeling. So when you're invited to the next event, you'll be more likely to accept because of the good feeling they instilled in you on your first visit.
The love-bombing might continue for a while. As one AR recruit later said, "Those first months, all my new friends from the AR Foundation were unusually kind to me....Little did I realize, that within a short time, I would cave in to their pressure to be outwardly expressive of a gratitude that I just didn't feel and they didn't deserve." Another ex-member, commenting on that story, said, "You really got it right as you explained how warm and friendly everyone can seem when they’re in recruitment mode..."
3. Dangling “The Prize‚” front of you
At some point, cult members will suggest that if you join or study with them, you can attain something special, such as, depending on the cult, happiness (most cults), the answer's to the world's mysteries (Scientology), a "cure" for homosexuality (Aesthetic Realism), or fantastic wealth (various multi-level marketing groups). This offer could come before, during, or after that initial event you were invited to, but it'll be there, because they need you to want something from them, otherwise they have no leverage over you.
At the event, the members will all seem very happy, and you'll probably be introduced to some "success stories", people whose lives have supposedly been totally turned around since joining the group, maybe either attaining the prize or being close to doing so. Now, so these success stories say, they're finally really happy, or they understand how the world works, or they're no longer gay/alcoholic/whatever, or they've made lots and lots of money, etc. You're supposed to look at them and imagine yourself attaining that same prize.
4. Extracting an agreement from you that you want the prize
After introducing the prize, they get you to agree that you
want it. This is actually pretty easy, because the prize
is usually attractive (who wouldn't want it?), and because admitting
your interest in it seems safe because you don't see any obligation
attached. The pitch might sound like any of these:
- "You do want to become financially independent, don't
you?"
- "Wouldn't it be exciting to really know the secrets of
the meaning of life?"
- "Would your life be better if you were no longer [gay/addicted
to alcohol/etc.]?"
- "Is it one of your goals to find a way to truly help the world?"
- "What have you got to lose? Isn't it worth [$x or y action] to find out whether this can really change your life?"
Once you agree, the cultists have sunk an important hook into
you, and they'll use it. By the way, notice some of the
psychology here: They don't tell you what you should want,
they get you to articulate it. They're trying to get
you to feel that the idea came from you. In the
future, you'll be less likely to argue, because you'd feel like
you'd be arguing with yourself. Once you say what you feel out
loud, that becomes part of your identity. Unfortunately, that
means you've taken the first big step into identifying with the
cult.
5. Shutting down your dissent by threatening to withhold the prize
By this point, the sell becomes a little harder.
You'll be encouraged to do things that you might rather not, like
devote more of your time to the group, start recruiting for them,
pay for expensive programs or study materials, or adopt more extreme
beliefs. Naturally, you might resist. But the cult
leaders are ready for that. When you show any resistance, they
simply threaten you that you'll never attain the prize if you keep
up that kind of attitude.
This tactic is shown quite plainly in the transcript of an Aesthetic
Realism consultation. The cult leaders shoot down
the student's questions by suggesting that he's doomed to a life of
homosexuality if he doesn't stop being "difficult".
Student: Yes.
Teacher: Did you like yourself for the way you talked, the way you listened? As you listened to yourself did you like the way you answered questions and even the way you asked questions? Did you, do you think...you were being argumentative for the purpose of not seeing what is true, and in fact thwarting?
Student: Well, I guess, maybe it would be, if I tried to, I guess I would have to say I was disappointed in myself for not catching on quicker.
Teacher: Yeah, but do you think there was anything argumentative? When I began to study Aesthetic Realism I wanted to see, but I also made a mistake in wanting to be superior...I did not know Aesthetic Realism and the tremendous knowledge that Eli Siegel had came to — on one hand I was grateful that Aesthetic Realism was so big there was something for me to learn — and it was true about me, I was grateful for that. But on the other hand, I made the stupid mistake of resenting the, the size of Aesthetic Realism and the fact that there was something new for me to learn. And do you think anything like that is going on in you?
Student: Yes.
Teacher: Because think about it this way: If Aesthetic Realism was something you already knew...your life, you've got a situation in your life you want to change, homosexuality...
Student: Right.
Teacher: Right? So if what you know already, what you've met all these years, had helped you in this field, you wouldn't be homosexual, right?
Student: Right.
Teacher: So what's your hope? Does your hope lie in Aesthetic Realism being just what you already knew, or Aesthetic Realism being new, and big, and explaining things you haven't understood, though you've been troubled by them?
Student: I want it to be new and big and explain things...
Threatening to withhold the prize isn't the only way the leaders shoot down objections, though. Notice that they used another one in the transcript above: They say that anyone who questions the teachings is simply trying to feel superior.
Actress Sarah Fazeli relates how the Landmark leaders threatened
her with not getting the prize when she raised an objection.
Early on she tried to get her money back, and the Landmark rep came
back with, "Let’s talk about this. Why do you feel this way? What
could you be resisting in your life? What if 'I want my money back'
is just a story you are telling yourself?"
Sarah then talked to another rep, who said, "Sarah, can you
honestly say you are where you want to be in your life?"
That's exactly out of the playbook. He followed up with, "What
is really going on here? What are you resisting?" Resisting,
trying to feel superior, whatever, it's just always turned around as
a criticism ofthe questioner. And then back to threatening
non-attainment of the prize: "I hear you, Sarah, but I want
you to be open to the possibilities that lay ahead for you...."
But maybe the most direct example of holding back the prize was at the seminar that Sarah attended, when a leader chastised attendees for taking unauthorized bathroom breaks: "You get up and take a break? Don’t blame me if come Sunday everyone else 'gets it' and you don’t. I can’t guarantee the transformation that will happen Sunday at 5pm unless you are here and present every second."
6. Establishment of guilt
Okay, so the recruit is in the door, and no longer asking
difficult questions. The next step is to make the
recruit feel guilty. Yale professor Robert Lifton called this
shaming the establishment of guilt in the landmark book
about the brainwashing of prisoners of war. The prisoners had
so successfully been made to feel guilty that they came to blame
themselves for their own incarceration.
Cult leaders shame their recruits because that makes the
recruits feel vulnerable and more susceptible to further
manipulation. It's also used to guilt-trip recruits into
getting more involved with the group. (For example, see this
ex-member's story.)
For the already-indoctrinated, playing the shame game ensures
that they remain committed to The Cause. As one ex-AR
member said:
Wow.
The Aesthetic Realists actually blew a third of a million
dollars on a double-page ad
in the New York Times to tell the world about AR, and in
that ad they talked about their guilt for not having respected
their cult enough: "We ourselves, we say with shame,
resented Eli Siegel and Aesthetic Realism because we respected them
so much." Another ex-member explains where that kind of
thinking comes from:
An ex-member of the Zendik cult had this to say: "For
me, the creepiest element of Zendik Farm was the way that shame was
used as a control mechanism...if the Zendiks didn’t like something
about you, they could shame you into submission by making your
private sh!t a matter of public disapproval."
7. Carrot/Stick
Behavior is reinforced by rewarding "good" behavior and
punishing "bad" behavior. Since we naturally seek to
minimize pain, this is a pretty powerful tool. An ex-member of
Zendik explains this clearly:
8. Control of identity, information, environment
Once a recruit is firmly in, other techniques can be added to keep them in. One of the most powerful is getting members to disassociate from the previous family and friends. The #1 reason a member would leave is because a family member or friend gets them to snap out of it, which is exactly why cults try to sever members' ties with the outside world as soon as they can. Similarly, they'll usually tell members that they can't trust the media, to get members to ignore any actual honest reporting that's critical of the group or its beliefs. (Does that ring any bells in the current political climate?!) Of course, no cult could get people to disassociate from family/friends and distrust the media right off the bat: first they have to suck you in with the methods above, and then once you're committed to attaining the prize, then the apply the hard sell.
These techniques can work on anyone who's not prepared for them, no matter how intelligent they are. Mind control is powerful stuff. But now that you know how the recipe works, you're much more likely to be able to recognize if someone tries to use it on you.