The idea behind socially-responsible
investing (SRI) is to invest in
companies that don't do objectionable things, such as
pollute the environment, exploit workers, or kill
animals. Who wants to invest in Shell Oil (for
example) when Shell destroys the land of indigenous
people on third-world countries — people who are often killed
for protesting such destruction, as was Ken Saro
Wiwa in Nigeria?
We buy stock because we hope the company will be
successful, which will cause the stock price to go up,
so we can sell the stock at a higher price and make
money. But if we buy stock in companies that do
bad things, then we're profiting from their
evil. Do we really want to make our money that
way? Here's a cartoon that puts this idea into
perspective:
Cartoon
reprinted by permission. Visit Troubletown.com
for more funny political cartoons.
|
Incidentally, despite what the cartoon says,
responsible investments don't have worse returns
than unethical ones. Even if they did,
many of us would prefer to sacrifice a small amount of
return for the ability to sleep at night.
That's the main reason to choose socially
responsible stocks, to avoid profiting from evil.
It's not because we're trying to keep our money from
going to bad companies, because when you buy stock
you're usually not buying directly from the
company—you're buying from other investors.
Investors like us just keep exchanging the stock
amongst ourselves, and the company doesn't see any of
the money. (Except when the company issues new
stock, which is rare.) The reason we don't buy
mainstream stocks is because our profit would be like
blood money.
There's another reason to boycott the stock of
bad companies: if enough people don't buy the
stock, then the stock price will go down. That
might not translate into lost money for the company,
but it means that it's harder for them to do things
such as borrow money. And since corporate
executives receive much of their compensation in the
form of stock, when the stock price goes down, it's
the rich corporate officers—who are directing the
company's bad activities—who take the hit. When they
take such a hit, they have a strong incentive to stop
offending investors with their questionable business
practices.
So what criteria do we use to distinguish a "good"
company from a "bad" company? Here's a sample
hierarchy:
- Companies whose very product or service is
questionable (e.g., weapons manufacturers and
tobacco companies).
- Companies whose product or service is benign, but
who have poor records in areas such as the
environment, minority advancement, community
involvement, or charitable contributions.
- Companies whose product or service is laudable,
but have poor records in the areas mentioned above.
- Companies whose product or service is benign and
have acceptable records on social responsibility..
- Companies whose product or service is laudable and
have acceptable records on social responsibility.
On the other hand, some say that no large company is
completely clean—some are just "less bad" than
others. For example, the largest plastics
recycler in the world is also the largest producer of
virgin plastic. And while producing bicycles is
a laudable goal, critics allege that a major bicycle
manufacturer uses sweatshop labor to produce its
bikes.
There are still yet other complications: Over the
years the small eco/responsible companies I list on
this site invariably seem to get bought out by a
larger company, or themselves grow bigger and then
attract multinational investors, or go out of
business. As an example of the second case, natural
foods maker Hain Foods merged with tea maker Celestial
Seasonings a while back and then continued to swallow
up dozens of small natural foods makers around the
country, and is now a big enough player that their
biggest investor is Wellington Management, whose primary
investors include Exxon Mobil, Pfizer, Alcoa,
Gillette, Pepsi, McDonald's, and Wal-Mart! Who would
have guessed?
Everyone draws the line in different places. Some
people will invest in anything, some will invest in
only certain companies which they feel are acceptable,
and some people want nothing to do with corporate
investing at all. This site is for those in that
middle category, who want to invest but are choosy
about which companies they'll invest in.
Can you make money with
socially-responsible stocks?
Yes. A common misconception (and one
perpetuated by the cartoon above) is that SR stocks
underperform regular stocks. In fact, many
socially-responsible funds outperform the
general market. (source)
The reason is simple: While bad practices
increase profits in one area, they cause losses in
other areas. For example, companies can make extra
profit by exploiting workers, customers, or the
environment, but they're also more likely to be sued
or fined for those same bad practices, which costs
them money. Also, companies that treat their
employees poorly have less productive employees and
thus earn less profit. Research by Professor
Alex Edmans of Wharton shows that very thing.
As he writes:
"There is a strong positive relationship
between employee satisfaction and shareholder
returns. Firms with high satisfaction outperform
peers by 3-4%/year, even when controlling for risk,
industries, characteristics and outliers. This
contradicts the traditional view that a dollar paid
to workers is a dollar lost from shareholders, and
that firms maximize shareholder value by working
their employees as hard as possible, and paying them
as little as possible. By contrast, it shows that
SRI screens based on employee welfare can improve
returns, whereas the traditional view is that SRI
investors have to sacrifice financial returns to
achieve their social goals." (more...)
The companies with the highest ratings in corporate
governance outperformed the S&P 500 by 16% over
the past five years. (GMI)
As Yahoo Finance said, "The GMI ratings incorporate
hundreds of data points across six broad categories
including, board accountability, financial
disclosure and internal controls, executive
compensation, shareholder rights, ownership base and
takeover provisions and social responsibility. The
majority of corporate governance red flags for US
companies came from the executive compensation
category."
What's the difference
between Socially Responsible Investing
(SRI) and Socially Responsible Stocks?
To understand this we need to first
understand about investing and stocks in general.
Investing simply means putting your money somewhere
in hopes of getting more money back. Examples
include:
- Putting your money in a savings account and
earning interest
- Buying a house and then having it appreciate in
value
- Buying stocks and selling them when the price
goes up
Investing in stocks is called investing in the
market, short for the stock market. There are
two ways to invest in the market:
- Individual Stocks. You open an account
with a broker and then buy and sell
individual stocks yourself. Most people don't do
this because they think it takes too much time, or
they're not confident about their ability to pick
good stocks.
- Mutual Funds. Or you can buy shares in a
mutual fund and let someone else do the
work in picking the stocks. A mutual fund
purchases large amounts of stock in lots of
companies, perhaps hundreds of them. When you buy
into a mutual fund you own a tiny chunk of that
fund, along with all the other investors. That way
you don't have to worry about what stocks to pick
and when to buy and sell; the mutual fund manager
handles that for you.
So to do SRI you have two choices: buy individual
stocks from companies that do good, or buy into a
socially-responsible mutual fund which screens the
companies whose stock they buy on a list of
socially-responsible criteria.
This website covers the former, reviewing dozens of
companies for those who want to buy individual
stocks. We list some SR mutual funds below for those
who want to buy into a mutual fund instead.
How common is SRI?
SRI isn't some fringe idea practiced only by
rich hippies. One out of eight dollars under
professional management in the U.S. is involved in
SRI, and Americans have over $2 trillion in SR
investments. (source)
Even the
Motley
Fool approves of SRI.
I spent a lot of time trying to find
companies whose stock I might be willing to buy, and
I created this site to share the results of my
findings. I looked mostly for companies whose
revenues came from attractive areas (e.g., recycling,
solar energy, natural foods), but didn't dig too deep
to find out the extent of their social responsibility.
In many cases, the companies are so small that
socially responsible information on them is hard to
come by, and I also figured that most companies formed
around positive products or services would have more
responsibility about their business practices than
would typical companies.
I found several companies which I felt are
definitely unattractive, but whose unattractive
features might be unknown to you, leading you
to mistakenly invest in them based on research you
did elsewhere which didn't happen to uncover their
less-than-desirable qualities. For example, Kaiser
Aluminum may be involved in recycling, but if so
they certainly didn't mention it on their website,
and notorious forest-clearcutter MAXXAM owns 2/3 of
Kaiser. I listed stocks like these in a special
section at the end of each category.
I am happy to share the results of my
research at no cost to you. If you want to help,
you can let me know when you find broken links,
information about companies listed here that's not on
the site, or new companies that I should add to the
site.
Mutual Funds
Maybe you're a new investor and are wary about
buying individual stocks yourself, preferring
something less risky or less time-consuming? Then
you might be interested in investing in a mutual
fund, or letting a management firm
invest your money for you.
With a mutual fund, a company takes your money and
other investors' money, and then invests it in stock
of several companies (maybe 10 to 400 companies,
depending on the fund). You own shares of the mutual
fund instead of owning shares in dozens of different
companies. You get the advantage of diversity,
without having to invest a lot of money. (If you
were buying the individual stocks yourself, the
commissions on trading would eat into your profits,
unless you had a lot of money to invest, say
more than $30,000.) Investing in a mutual fund
instead of individual stocks is simpler, saves you a
lot of time, and gives you diversity when investing
smaller amounts of money. But you don't get to make
the choices about what individual stocks to buy and
sell. Most mutual funds will invest in anything as
long as the fund managers think the stocks they buy
will make money, but there are over 100 socially-responsible
mutual funds which only buy stock in companies which
pass certain social responsibility screenings. Here
are some examples:
- Socially Responsible in General: Domini,
Calvert
Group (Java), PAX
World Fund
Environmentally-Oriented: Green
Century and New
Alternatives
Cruelty-Free (no animal abuse): Cruelty
Free Value Fund
Women-Oriented: Women's
Equity
Gay/Lesbian-Orinted: Meyers
Pride Value Fund
Water-Related: Summit
Global
Note that some "socially-responsible" funds seem to
have very lax criteria -- after reviewing which
stocks they hold, you might think, "Gee what WON'T
they invest in?" On the other hand, some funds
intentionally buy stock in "bad" companies so they
can file stockholder resolutions, allowing all the
stockholders to vote to require the company to phase
out the use of environmentally damaging materials,
allow independent auditors to review the working
conditions of their third-world workers, etc.
Note also that many socially-responsible funds lose
money for their investors, or earn less money
than beginning investors could have made themselves!
Be sure to check out a fund's performance and
investment criteria thoroughly before giving your
money to them. Lists and reviews of various SRI
mutual funds are available from:
-
Social
Investment
Forum | Social
Funds | Green
Money
Holding Mutual Funds accountable. Owning
stock means that you're a part owner of the company
whose stock you hold and you can vote on issues at
the annual stockholder meeting (by mail, if you
can't attend). But when you own shares of the mutual
fund it's really the mutual fund company that owns
the stock, not you, so they're the ones who get to
vote. For years most funds kept their voting record
secret, but a law that took effect in Aug. 2004 now
requires funds to disclose their voting records. Not
surprisingly many mutual funds are looking for
loopholes in the law, and Co-op America is
encouraging citizens to demand
accountability from the mutual funds.
Management Firms
In contrast to buying stocks or mutual fund shares
yourself, a management firm invests your
money for you, carefully picking stocks and/or
mutual funds that meet your investment criteria, for
a fee. Examples of firms which handle
investments for socially-conscious clients include Rocky
Mountain Humane Investing, Natural
Investments, New
Ground, and Gred
Wendt.
Investment Clubs
An investment club is a small group of people who
pool their money together to invest, and decide
collectively which companies to invest in. In some
clubs the members make all investment decisions
directly, and in others the members elect a board of
directors to make the decisions.
An investment club is like a very small mutual
fund. The advantages are that you can start
investing with a very small amount of money, because
you're pooling your money with other investors, and
you have some say in what companies to invest in. A
club you might be interested in is RainFrog
Ethical Investment Partnership.
Good
&
Bad Companies
Responsible
Shopper lists companies according to various
criteria.
SocialFunds.com
has SR information about hundreds companies.
MoneyWisdom.com.
Links to lists of socially-responsible companies.
PETA
lists which companies do and don't test their
products on animals.
The Council on Economic Priorities used to
rate hundreds of corporations on issues such as
environmental commitment, workplace issues,
community outreach, minority advancement, and
military contracts, but in Dec. 2004 they seemed to
have disappeared off the face of the Internet. Back
when their ratings were up, sometimes they seemed
very lenient, giving good marks to some notorious
multinationals.
Good Companies
SustainableBusiness.com
publishes a newsletter profiling
socially-responsible companies.
Good
Money links to various lists of
companies with good records.
Clean Edge
publishes reports about companies involved
in renewable energy, alternative
transportation, clean water, and
non-hazardous materials.
Renewable
Energy
Stocks reviews exactly what you think
they would.
|
Bad Companies
Multinational Monitor recognizes the
10 Worst Corporations every year. Here's their
list for 2007
and for previous
years.
Russell Mokhiber (co-author of Corporate
Predators) lists the 100
Worst
Corporations of the decade
(1990-2000).
|
On a related note, a site called Responsible
Consumption highlights products that are
organic, eco-friendly, sweatshop-free, etc.
I'm always happy to hear of other stocks to
list on this page. If you know of other stocks
which fit into the categories on the left, please
let me know. But please don't put
me on a mailing list to receive your company's press
releases -- I need to know about a company once, not
all the time.
Other SRI resources include:
You have one of the best lists of SRI
options on the web. This is a public service
that I wish more people would use. --
Tucker Gilman,
Jan. 2003
Descriptions that contain no attribution
came from Yahoo!
Descriptions from the Green
Money
Online Guide are followed by"GMOG".
Descriptions from Citizens Trust (which no longer
exists) are followed by (CT).
Descriptions written by me or my assistant are signed
by our initials (MBJ or RS). These were
usually written from information we got from the
company's website.
Notes that were added by me to a description found
elsewhere are listed [inside brackets]. If
there's no date on an entry then it was one of the
original ones I added, in June 1998.
The
symbol at the beginning of each entry is a link to
Yahoo!'s profile of that company. If no profile is
available, I linked to the chart. If no chart is
available, I linked to the quote.
The name of each company is the link to its
home page, if I could find it.
Companies listed in italics are
bulletin board (over-the-counter) stocks.
Canadian Stocks. Stock symbols ending in ".V"
or ".AL" are traded on the Canadian
Venture Exchange
I make absolutely no
guarantee as to the accuracy of any of the
information contained in this site. Nothing herein
should be construed as advice to buy or to not buy
stock in any particular company. Any investment
decisions you make are your own, and you should
realize that 100% of your investment is at risk when
you invest in stocks. Mutual funds and management
firms are listed for information purposes only and
listing does not constitute an endorsement.
©1998-2011 Michael Bluejay | All rights reserved
|