Sincerely, and kooperatively, ricardo
guerrero
Addendum
by Michael Bluejay
At the 8/24 Board of Trustees meeting, trustee Mac McKaskle said that KOOP would be returning the $5,000 Elton John grant because "KOOP could not accept the money in good faith", since the grant was supposed to go to organizations that support gay, lesbian, and AIDS issues, and that KOOP has failed in that regard because the environment at KOOP is supposedly hostile to these issues. Community Board member Eduardo Vera then suggested that KOOP also return grant money from the City of Austin (around $14,000), since KOOP is hostile to underserved communities.
Naturally, we feel that the claim that KOOP is hostile to underserved communities is absurd. Mac himself produces a program called Queer Waves on KOOP. And while Mac has tried to portray Friends of KOOP as anti-gay homophobes, he ignores the fact that some of his biggest critics in Friends of KOOP are also members of the gay community. As we've stated repeatedly, we're Friends of Diversity as much as we're Friends of KOOP. We're angry that board members continue to slander us without every providing any examples of the wild claims that they're making about us. (In the meantime, note that our own website is filled with specific examples of the board's actions.)
But getting back to the point about returning the grant money, KOOP's entire operating budget in 1997 was only $75,000. Returning $5,000 or $19,000 worth of grant money could be catastrophic to say the least -- there might not BE any KOOP Radio in a couple of months if we give this money back. If the board really has the best interests of the station at heart, then why is it taking a direction that puts the entire station in financial jeopardy? Has the board decided that they're going to be recalled, and if THEY can't run the station, then there's not going to be a station for ANYBODY ELSE to run, either?
And if KOOP can't accept grant money in good faith because we've failed in our mission, then how can we accept money from our members, either? Why are we even going to bother having a pledge drive? Why is the board continuing to serve, rather than resigning, if they feel that KOOP has failed in its mission? If they feel that they need to stay to help KOOP work toward fulfilling its mission, then isn't giving our money away the exact OPPOSITE of working to save the station?
And unfortunately, this isn't the only example of questionable financial management. The board has apparently spent nearly $2,300 to mailout its own political spin to KOOP members to try to convince the membership not to recall them.