If I disappointed them, then I now consider that a
badge of honor.
by Wayne Smith, Feb. 4,
2006
Funny how the brain
washing comes back after 25 years. I was thinking how I
would start this and was going to write about"AR" and
immediately thought someone would ask me if I was showing
respect by using just initials for this cult. lol
To tell you the truth,
I was a little hesitant to write as it was a fairly positive
experience for me, in spite of this group and not because of
them. I met some great people (who left the group too).
I lived in New York for a year so I enjoyed the cultural
experience. And I finally made peace with my homosexuality
(after I left). AR was my last attempt to change after
psychology and religion had also failed.
It did amaze me to
read on your site that Eli
Seigel had committed suicide as that certainly
did not come out once during my time there. The one
thing that really seems a racket to me is how they tell you
that you are not ready to express gratitude when you say you
haven't changed from homosexuality and maybe if you would
donate some money it would help. I cannot believe that they
are denying that they led us to believe they could change
people from H as they called it. I was there in the early
80's and gay people outnumbered the straight people and
changing from homosexualty was one of the main topics.
I am a very private
person and don't like to push people to believe things I do
[but] they soon had me wearing a victim of the
press button and writing letters to Time magazine and
demonstrating in the streets.
"One [AR member] actually opened an
umbrella in an ELEVATOR to show how displeased they
were with the former member!"
I keep contact with a couple of friends of mine that are
former members who say that when they meet active people in
AR [the AR people] cross over to the other side of
the street. One actually opened an umbrella in an ELEVATOR
to show how displeased they were with the former member! In
1982, my AR roommate used to listen in on my calls to my
family and then criticize me when I got off the phone. My
consultants told me not to fly home for Christmas as I was
not "ready" to be fair to AR while I was there. Christmas is
a big deal in our family and it took a couple of years to
mend family relations for the one Christmas in my life that
I did not spend with my family.
After reading your
site, I can well imagine how badly my life would have turned
out if I had stayed very much longer. I have been with
my gay lover now for 3 years and am very happy. And I can
say without qualification, it has nothing to do with my time
spent in the AR cult! So go ahead and publish my name. Their
disapproval means nothing to me now. I felt bad all the time
I was there as nothing I did could please these people. If I
disappointed them, then I now consider that a badge of
honor.
Reader comments about this
article
Add a comment about this page
Feel free to add your thoughts to this page. We don't allow attacks on the contributors, though. (Why not?)
Former members describe Aesthetic Realism
The ULTIMATE statement by a former member. Wow. A former Aesthetic Realism member who was involved for over ten years and into the 1990's sent us this incredibly detailed account of what life inside AR is like. This puts to rest once and for all any lingering question about whether AR is a cult - it is. The AR people will not be able to "counter" this on their Countering the Lies website because this account is from one of their own, and because it's so exhaustively detailed.
A tale of getting sucked in. Another former member shares his experiences. This story is unique because he describes exactly how he initially got drawn in, and how he then kept getting more and more involved.
Aesthetic Realism ruined his marriage. "[It] introduced a level of stress in my marriage that had not previously existed....I consider my 'study' of Aesthetic Realism to be one of the factors that led to the eventual breakup of my marriage, to my eternal sorrow." This former member also wrote about AR on Steve Hassan's Freedom of Mind.
On having all the answers. A former member explains how AR members think they have all the answers, and feel qualified to lecture others about how they should view personal tragedy.
Kicked out for remaining gay. A former student describes how he was kicked out of AR because he couldn't change from homosexuality. Powerful stuff.
"I want Ellen Reiss questioned!" A former member tells her story, and wonders why there hasn't been a class-action lawsuit against the foundation yet.
They took his consultation tape. A former student describes how AR people kept his consultation tape with his most intimate thoughts on it, and told him he couldn't study any more unless he incorporated AR more radically into his life.
Michael Bluejay's description. This whole website is my statement about Aesthetic Realism. But in this article I describe my family's involvement in more detail.
To teach Siegel's philosophy of aesthetic
realism.
Philosophy
The key to all social ills is for people to learn to like the world. Having contempt for the world leads to unhappiness and even insanity. (The slogan of their newsletter is "Contempt causes insanity".) Homosexuality is seen as a form of insanity caused by not liking the world sufficiently.
Also teaches that "beauty is the making one of
opposites".
Location
New York City (SoHo)
Membership
About 103 (35 teachers, 41 training to be teachers, and 27 regular students). Has failed to grow appreciably even after 70 years of
existence, and is currently shrinking.
Members call themselves "students". Advanced
members who teach others are called
"consultants".
Method of study
Public seminars/lectures at their headquarters
(in lower Manhattan), group classes, and
individual consultations (three consultants
vs. one student).
Cult aspects
Fanatical devotion to their
leader/founder
Belief that they have the one true answer to
universal happiness
Ultimate purpose is to recruit new
members
Feeling that they are being persecuted
Wild, paranoid reactions to criticism
Non-communication (or at least very limited communication) with those who have left
the group
How do you decide which side is telling the truth? I think that would be the side willing to stand behind what he says. Since 2005 I've had an open offer to debate the Aesthetic Realists publicly in a formal format at any time to defend what I've said on this site, and to answer their own charges against me. But the AR people won't do it. Their excuse is, "He's not worth debating." But if that's true, then why did they put up a ninety-six page website to try to snipe at me and to try to rebut what I'm saying? I think the answer is that they're content to hide behind the cover of the Internet, but they know how bad they'd look in a live format where anyone actually got to ask any pointed questions.
You know what's really funny? Someone went to one of their public presentations, said he'd seen this site, and asked about the cult allegations. The AR person said, "It's very easy to say crap like that on the Internet and never have to be challenged." Oh, the irony is killing me!
Anyway, Aesthetic Realists, as for a public debate, I'm ready when you are. And to everyone else, when the AR people won't stand behind what they're saying, why should anyone take what they say seriously?
Want to know when I update this site?
Get on our list and I'll let you know when I have new stuff.
And of course, your address is confidential.
The current AR members who troll this site are welcome to sign up too.