What was it about Aesthetic Realism that compelled
me to waste over two years of my life?
written by a former AR student, April 5,
2005
My Introduction to AR
Decades have passed since I last had any contact with
the cult known as Aesthetic Realism. I have also tried
to limit how much I've thought about it as well (it's pretty
embarrassing, actually), except for the purpose of answering
the question: "What was it about AR that compelled me to
waste over two years of my life?" Actually, there were a lot
of reasons. The initial two are fairly typical, I would
guess. I was a very idealistic (okay, gullible) young
college student who wasn't nearly as discerning as I've
hopefully become. As such, I still believed in the
possibility of there being a singular technique to achieve
personal happiness. For me, there was something very
appealing
"The other reason is that I knew two very
sweet 'students' of AR -- sweet when they saw a
possible recruit."
about a philosophy that promised to unify one's life in a
way that imitated art. The other reason is that I knew two
very sweet "students" of AR -- sweet when they saw a
possible recruit. They acted pretty balanced and normal and
kept the Eli Siegel idolatry at a low volume, in the
beginning. Both were men, one stating that ES and AR
"changed" him from being a homosexual. The other fellow
wasn't gay, or "H" as it was called in the language of AR
Speak. He seemed to be kind of rudderless before dropping
anchor on AR, which was the answer to all his questions and
longings. Rudderless would describe some of the students,
but I think AR convinced many that they were without hope,
meaning, or direction just to prime them for indoctrination.
Sounds like a cult to me.
My first impression of these guys was that they were
pleasant, and seemed to be learning a lot about art, poetry,
and life in general. This appealed to me, but I still didn't
commit to looking into it, until one of them lent me the
book, Hot Afternoons Have Been In Montana, which is a
compilation of Eli Siegel's poetry. I was pretty blown away
by it. It IS wonderful poetry. That was when I decided to
"wade" into the waters -- tepidly, like a priest into a
strip club. I signed up for one of Chaim Koppleman's
Saturday art classes. I liked him and respected his vast
knowledge of art, so next came the Saturday presentations at
the Terrain Gallery. I went no further than attending the
class and the programs for about eight months. Actually my
new AR friends were starting to apply the hard sell a bit
more so the word "cult" did come to mind , but I
naïvely believed that it couldn't be a cult because it
wasn't religious in nature. I was enjoying the Saturday
classes and didn't buy into the whole "infallibility" of ES,
so I didn't see any danger.
In Deeper
Those first months, all my new friends from the AR
Foundation were unusually kind to me. [Ed. note:
Therapists specializing in recovery from cults call this
"Love Bombing".] I was invited to Thanksgiving dinner
(where they gave thanks to Eli Siegel and Aesthetic Realism,
no mention of pilgrims), Christmas parties (where they gave
thanks to Eli Siegel and Aesthetic Realism, Jesus who?) and
New Year's Eve celebrations (where they gave thanks to Eli
Siegel and Aesthetic Realism for the previous year and for
the coming one). I guess if I had been asked to give a brief
description of my new friends, I would say they were gentle,
studious, and oh so thankful. Little did I realize, that
within a short time, I would cave in to their pressure to be
outwardly expressive of a gratitude that I just didn't feel
and they didn't deserve.
Consultations
After recruiting someone into AR, the goal is to get them
into "consultations", their special brand of three-on-one
therapy. How I wound up having consultations is pretty
simple: They reeled me in like a brook trout. Within months
of my first foray into the world of AR, my life was suddenly
entangled with AR students. I went to school with them, took
AR classes with them, and socialized with them. I was
foolish to have not seen this coming, but maybe that's easy
to say when looking back over so many years. In either case,
guilt
"They reeled me in like a brook trout...They
told me I was "not showing respect for this great
education I was receiving" by continuing to avoid
having consultations."
was introduced into the experience. They told me I was "not
showing respect for this great education I was receiving" by
continuing to avoid having consultations. I didn't want the
exposure consultations would mean as I always kept my
feelings pretty close to the vest. I didn't know these
people well, nor did I have reason to trust them. Also, I
didn't really think I had much to say. I remember going to
confession as a young Catholic boy and watching the priest
roll his eyes out of boredom. Still, with all my "friends"
pushing, I buckled like a belt and went.
The first few consultations were pretty tame as my
consultants gently explained how AR has answers to my
particular issues. It was all pretty innocuous and they
never really got as personally critical as some of the other
consultation tag teams in all the time I took consultations.
They did gradually apply more and more pressure on me to
commit ever more of my life to Eli Siegel and Aesthetic
Realism. Looking back, I think I thought more about them
then I did about what they had to say to me. Their lives of
singular devotion to Siegel seemed excessive. One of my
consultants was Koppelman, a man whose art I did and still
do admire greatly. There seemed to be a suppressed warmth
about him, a warmth that was evident in his more
unrestrained moments, before he would catch himself and
retreat behind the false party line of AR. Another
consultant of mine, who I shall not name, was heart
wrenching in what seemed to be continual uneasiness. He was
young and clearly afraid to say the wrong thing in front of
his older colleges so he often simply rephrased what the
others had just said (but still in AR Speak). I was sure he
wasn't into AR, but being that many of his family members
were students, he was in up to his neck. I liked him and,
not surprisingly, he is no longer with AR. He's free.
In Up To My Neck
Within a year of my introduction to AR, I was taking
Saturday classes, going to seminars and programs on
Thursdays and Saturdays, having consultations that were of
little help to me personally and always left me wondering
about the hidden lives of these consultants (and they
weren't inexpensive), and attending what was called "The
Critical Inquiry" with Dorothy Koppelman, wife of Chaim. To
varying degrees, all these AR folks were manipulative, but
this woman really raised the bar. Of the few members of the
AR hierarchy that I met (thankfully, I was a lowly consultee
so I wasn't interacting much with
"I went to 6 or 7 of these critiques and
never once heard a dissenting opinion."
the top dogs), this woman was incredibly cruel. The
Critical Inquiry was simply a Sunday "class" in which
artists (AR students or not) would bring in their paintings,
drawings, etc. for a critical review. The format was pretty
simple: work would be displayed, finished or in progress,
and Koppelman (who is quite knowledgable about art and art
history, as well as being a talented painter in her own
right) would ask the artist to state his/her purpose for
creating their work. She would either praise or criticize
the work. This was followed by others in the class echoing
her opinion. I went to 6 or 7 of these critiques and never
once heard a dissenting opinion. AR students could always be
counted on to fall into lockstep when one of the hierarchy
expressed an opinion ("opinion" translates to: "truth").
When she praised a work, they all praised it. When she
criticized something, they followed suit. So be it, but what
sticks in my craw to this day is how she would publicly
humiliate some of these people in a very personal way
because of the "contempt for Eli Siegel and Aesthetic
Realism" that was evident in their work. I saw a woman
quietly sob because Koppelman laced into her about how she
saw men (as evidenced in a small sculpture that this woman,
to my mind, courageously displayed with the hope of
understanding her art and herself). All the other zombies
piled on and to my enduring shame, I didn't defend her. If
the woman I'm speaking of is reading this and, by chance,
recognizes herself in this remembrance, I am deeply, deeply
sorry, for I knew better and should have spoken up.
Incidentally, this woman never returned to the AR
Foundation. So much for their deep kindness and
compassion.
This wasn't the only time Koppelman displayed her fangs.
During another Critical Inquiry, a gay male student of AR
brought in a charcoal drawing of a female nude. Koppelman
noted with horror that the female looked sort of muscular
and manly and that this was evidence of the student's
homosexual tendencies, which had supposedly been changed to
heterosexuality through his study of AR. This was a sure
sign of...you guessed it... his "contempt for ES and AR".
(Why do they even need teachers, just play a tape loop
continuously over a loudspeaker of the limited AR phrases.)
Well, it never occurred to Ms. Koppelman that HE'S GAY!
ALWAYS WAS! ALWAYS WILL BE! SIEGEL DIDN'T CHANGE HIM! IT'S
NOT A CHARACTER FLAW! Being a woman who is unable to
empathize with people who don't adhere to her narrow and
inflexible beliefs...that's a character flaw. I never went
back to her class after that display and frankly, don't want
to waste any more time on her here, except to express my
great gratitude to her for her helping to lift the veil from
my eyes about AR, for she was the one who got the ball
rolling for my exit.
What The Hell Am I Doing Here?
After the "education" I got from D.K., it seemed that
clues were popping up everywhere. It was like going from a
darkened room out into the bright sunlight. After a short
time, your eyes begin to adjust until everything comes into
clear focus. More and more the AR zombies demanded that I
express gratitude to ES and AR. Every paper that a student
wrote had to end with the obligatory "I am so grateful to ES
and AR for..." along with "I deeply regret that I have met
this great knowledge with contempt...". I went along with it
for a short time just to get them off my back, but that just
wasn't my style. I didn't like saying what I didn't feel, so
I started to resist (Heck, we all learn a lot more from
parents, former teachers, friends, colleges, etc. and aren't
expected to walk around all day expressing gratitude and
flogging ourselves for being ungrateful.) That's when the
"criticism" would come raining down, intending to break my
spirit. It didn't work, for I didn't think much of these
people at that point, but I was starting to hate that I was
one of them. You know the old saying: "Show me your friends
and I'll tell you who you are". More often, I skipped
classes, didn't schedule consultations, and rarely went to
seminars and programs. I didn't buy the "perfection" of ES
and AR and couldn't share the hostility to anyone who would
dare question anything about either.
Getting Out
In the last couple of months or so my doubts about AR
were being confirmed. One of the men who introduced me to AR
was one of Siegel's homosexual "changelings" who wrote paper
after paper and gave many, many lectures on
"He told me that he studied with Eli Siegel
for around 6 years and that it's taken even more to
get over it. His eyes started filling up."
his [supposedly] permanent change from
homosexuality, his passionate marriage to a woman and how
Eli Siegel "saved him". He was what was called a "consultant
in training" which was the middle tier in the strict AR
caste system. Then one day I saw him leering at a man's body
and that just added to my growing belief that all the
proclamations that came from the students of AR were
completely hollow. Reading the Orwell novel 1984
illuminated a little light bulb in my head. I kept thinking,
"My God! Is this about Aesthetic Realism?!"
Lastly, a very jarring experience came on a day that I
was having lunch at a counter in a Soho coffee shop. Two men
came in and noticing my silly "Victim of the Press" button,
one said to me: "So Aesthetic Realism is still around?
That's unfortunate." A year earlier, I would have dutifully
proclaimed that he was "having contempt for the most
beautiful knowledge and greatest man the world has known",
but those days were long gone. I asked him why he felt that
way. He looked at me and said that my even asking showed
that I would "leave and be all right". He told me that he
studied with Eli Siegel for around 6 years and that it's
taken even more to get over it. His eyes started filling up.
That was more true feeling than I saw in all the "grateful"
students combined. For me, that was enough. I was out of
there.
Aftermath
When I left I immediately felt as though a 200 lb. weight
was taken from my shoulders. Two years of tension between my
family and myself rapidly eased. My father was thrilled that
I "got that spark back". Recovering my self confidence and
ambition, I started my own successful business. I began
speaking like a free thinking person again, not with the
group speak that the ARealists use. I didn't monitor every
thought and word. I didn't use the group facial expressions.
When listening to a fellow member pour his/her heart out
about his/her terrible life before Aesthetic Realism, it was
very effective to tilt one's head to the side, lean forward
a bit, and arch the eyebrows upward in a pained expression.
If you've ever seen a teary eyed clown painted on velvet,
you kind of get the picture.
Life seemed to have more ease, like running after taking
off the ankle weights. I did try to contact the closer
friends I had at AR to explain why I left and that I still
cared about them, but none would speak to me. (I believe
that ARealists are very afraid of former students because we
introduce doubt.) That was fine, I just hoped that one day
they would wake up too. One did, a woman who left AR many
years later. She called to apologize for ignoring me. The
ARealists lies' about former students' never finding
happiness were the complete opposite of what happened to me.
Unfortunately, it did take awhile for me to fully appreciate
art and poetry again as I had become so conditioned to block
my personal responses and merely see them through the narrow
prism of Aesthetic Realist dogma. That too came, in
time.
Conclusion
A few days ago, I was rearranging my bookshelves and came
across some of my old Eli Siegel poetry books. I took some
time to read some of the work that I haven't read in so many
years. Boy, he was quite a poet and his masterwork: Self
and World is a masterpiece of philosophical theory. This
is one reason why some (including me) were attracted to
Aesthetic Realism. Ironically, his massively harmful cult
has done more to obscure the value of his work than reveal
it. Their quest to totally dominate one's patterns of
thought is the most terrifying aspect. Reading the poems got
me to thinking about the people I had met at the Aesthetic
Realism Foundation. Out of curiosity, I keyed them in a
search engine and found their website and, more importantly,
this one. I was so thrilled to read the stories by the
former students and kept finding myself saying out loud,
"YES! YES! THAT'S HOW IT WAS!" I could hardly sleep that
night out of happiness for the existence of this site. I
kept reading passages from the site to my wife long into the
night. The portrayal of Ellen Reiss was spot on. With the
suicide of Big Brother, she took over as Big Sister in every
sense. I remember her as a cold, haughty, and elitist woman
who reveled in her queen bee position and, as ruler of the
cult that preaches continual criticism, is hypocritically
self-exempted. Out of a sense of delayed justice, I felt
driven to write my story. I now feel I can truly put it to
rest. What do I hope will come of it? Hopefully, someone who
has joined or is thinking of joining this group will use my
words to really think critically about this cult. The poor
souls who have been there for 30 plus years are probably
lost, but not the newer ones. I wish there was the web, and
this site, when I went through my ordeal. It would have
saved me a lot of time and pain. Oh, and by the way, despite
their evasions, one of the central pillars of this cult was
the changing of homosexuals into heterosexuals. It was
everywhere in their literature and presentations. I even
remember, after I had already left, some of the "changed"
students being on David Susskind. They had deep disdain for
homosexuality and saw it as a cause of insanity. I also
remember a publication from the early 70's in which Eli
Siegel trumpets the death of capitalism (how's that going?).
I also still own an old copy of the book: Self and
World in which Siegel's wife declares the publication to
be greater than the Bible and the works of Shakespeare. So
now I'm finished thinking about Aesthetic Realism and it's
time to get back to my wife, family, and my happiness.
Reader comments about this
article
Thank you for this true and vivid statement
April 10, 2005 1:42
Dear Sir,
As a person who also did time in AR, I am absolutely blown away by your statement, as I have been by several others posted here. You’ve described so accurately how they operate that I felt like my own history with this cult was unfolding before my eyes. You really got it right as you explained how warm and friendly everyone can seem when they’re in recruitment mode, but once you’ve been reeled in, as you so aptly put it, you begin to see how unkind, even ruthless, many of them are when dealing with anyone who isn’t cut from their mold and in complete lockstep with them. And the deeper you get into it, the more apparent what it’s really all about becomes: mind control and adulation of Eli Siegel. The actual principles of AR get lost in the shuffle.
There’s a lot more I could say, but I just wanted to thank you for taking the time to write down your experience and post it on this website because it helps me get more perspective on my own experience. I also think you have done the world a great service in writing it.
Sincerely,
X-AR
Add a comment about this page
Feel free to add your thoughts to this page. We don't allow attacks on the contributors, though. (Why not?)
Former members describe Aesthetic Realism
The ULTIMATE statement by a former member. Wow. A former Aesthetic Realism member who was involved for over ten years and into the 1990's sent us this incredibly detailed account of what life inside AR is like. This puts to rest once and for all any lingering question about whether AR is a cult - it is. The AR people will not be able to "counter" this on their Countering the Lies website because this account is from one of their own, and because it's so exhaustively detailed.
A tale of getting sucked in. Another former member shares his experiences. This story is unique because he describes exactly how he initially got drawn in, and how he then kept getting more and more involved.
Aesthetic Realism ruined his marriage. "[It] introduced a level of stress in my marriage that had not previously existed....I consider my 'study' of Aesthetic Realism to be one of the factors that led to the eventual breakup of my marriage, to my eternal sorrow." This former member also wrote about AR on Steve Hassan's Freedom of Mind.
On having all the answers. A former member explains how AR members think they have all the answers, and feel qualified to lecture others about how they should view personal tragedy.
Kicked out for remaining gay. A former student describes how he was kicked out of AR because he couldn't change from homosexuality. Powerful stuff.
"I want Ellen Reiss questioned!" A former member tells her story, and wonders why there hasn't been a class-action lawsuit against the foundation yet.
They took his consultation tape. A former student describes how AR people kept his consultation tape with his most intimate thoughts on it, and told him he couldn't study any more unless he incorporated AR more radically into his life.
Michael Bluejay's description. This whole website is my statement about Aesthetic Realism. But in this article I describe my family's involvement in more detail.
To teach Siegel's philosophy of aesthetic
realism.
Philosophy
The key to all social ills is for people to learn to like the world. Having contempt for the world leads to unhappiness and even insanity. (The slogan of their newsletter is "Contempt causes insanity".) Homosexuality is seen as a form of insanity caused by not liking the world sufficiently.
Also teaches that "beauty is the making one of
opposites".
Location
New York City (SoHo)
Membership
About 103 (35 teachers, 41 training to be teachers, and 27 regular students). Has failed to grow appreciably even after 70 years of
existence, and is currently shrinking.
Members call themselves "students". Advanced
members who teach others are called
"consultants".
Method of study
Public seminars/lectures at their headquarters
(in lower Manhattan), group classes, and
individual consultations (three consultants
vs. one student).
Cult aspects
Fanatical devotion to their
leader/founder
Belief that they have the one true answer to
universal happiness
Ultimate purpose is to recruit new
members
Feeling that they are being persecuted
Wild, paranoid reactions to criticism
Non-communication (or at least very limited communication) with those who have left
the group
How do you decide which side is telling the truth? I think that would be the side willing to stand behind what he says. Since 2005 I've had an open offer to debate the Aesthetic Realists publicly in a formal format at any time to defend what I've said on this site, and to answer their own charges against me. But the AR people won't do it. Their excuse is, "He's not worth debating." But if that's true, then why did they put up a ninety-six page website to try to snipe at me and to try to rebut what I'm saying? I think the answer is that they're content to hide behind the cover of the Internet, but they know how bad they'd look in a live format where anyone actually got to ask any pointed questions.
You know what's really funny? Someone went to one of their public presentations, said he'd seen this site, and asked about the cult allegations. The AR person said, "It's very easy to say crap like that on the Internet and never have to be challenged." Oh, the irony is killing me!
Anyway, Aesthetic Realists, as for a public debate, I'm ready when you are. And to everyone else, when the AR people won't stand behind what they're saying, why should anyone take what they say seriously?
What former members say...
They reeled me in like a brook trout... Guilt was introduced into the experience. They told me I was "not showing respect for this great education I was receiving" by [not getting more involved].
If there is anything the Aesthetic Realists are good at, it is convincing people that if they think they see anything wrong with Siegel, AR, Reiss or how the organization is run, there is really something wrong with them. Any time I began to question things or think I saw something amiss, I had been programmed to think that what it really meant was that something was terribly wrong with me.
My new AR friends were starting to apply the hard sell a bit more so the word "cult" did come to mind , but I naïvely believed that it couldn't be a cult because it wasn't religious in nature.
They get you to actually control yourself. A lot of people's lives have been hurt --ruined.
So, there was Eli Siegel, who came up with all these rules, but to whom none of the rules applied, and there was everybody else.
[Eli Siegel] was a hurtful person. He was a sociopath. He was a control freak, and he was a cult leader.
Poor John then would be the subject of an onslaught of criticism to help him see his own contempt for Eli Siegel.... This is merely one example of the way people were controlled and humiliated if they stepped out of line or didn't conform to accepted behavior.
We all had to present ourselves as essentially miserable failures whose lives were in shambles until we found the glorious "answers to all our questions" in AR.
It was very difficult for me to surrender to AR in the total fashion they seemed to want.
I received a call from one of the AR bigwigs asking me to donate money to the foundation. When I told him I was low on cash I received a considerable verbal drubbing.
I consider my "study" of Aesthetic Realism to be one of the factors that led to the eventual breakup of my marriage, to my eternal sorrow.
I felt a bit raped psychologically.... if you are thinking of getting into the AR consultation process, realize that they could end it all suddenly, and that you could find your most intimate thoughts on tape in someone else's possession.
They flatter you to death and tell you that you're so wonderful, and you have all these qualities that others have never seen. And then there's this horrible criticizing.
That's when I finally knew for sure: AESTHETIC REALISM IS A CULT. I swore on that moment that if I was ever given the opportunity to tell the world what these people did to me, I would.
When I left I was definitely shunned by other students. I would meet people in the NYC streets -as I still do to this day - and they would turn the other way to avoid me, or some even made derogatory comments about me.
[New AR students] would be shocked if they knew that the lives of the people they are supposed to learn from are very different from the principles they are taught in consultations. Even though publicly the AR foundation preaches respect for people and like of the world, inside the organization the message is very different. The underlying feeling is, "People who do not study AR are inferior to us, and the world is our enemy, out to get us." We had contempt for outsiders and were scared of the world. We huddled together for safety, secure in our sense of superiority.
When I was studying, we were allowed to associate with our families only if they continuously demonstrated that they were grateful to and respectful of Eli Siegel and AR. This did not include going to visit them if they lived far away because then we would have had to miss classes, and that would have meant we were "making our family more important than AR."
Some of the students I remember going at most intensely and viciously to stop them from associating with their families, (and whom we succeeded in stopping for many, many years), are people who are now bragging on the AR website about how great their relationships with their families are and writing as though that was always the case.
There were even instances of students refusing to visit their parents when one of them was dying because the parents did not "express regret" and renounce their unfairness to Eli Siegel and AR. There were parents who literally begged their son or daughter to relent so they could see them one more time, but the child refused. The parent died without ever seeing their child again. Far from being criticized for such behavior, students who went this far were seen as heroes in AR. They received public praise from Ellen Reiss.
While I was in AR, I did believe that Eli Siegel was greater than Christ.... It would have been accurate to say I worshipped him.
People were told that if their families did not support aesthetic realism, they were not their families.
Some of the people with statements on the Countering the Lies website claiming that AR students do not shun former students have actually passed me on the street, looked straight at me, and pretended they were seeing right through me. This includes people in the highest positions in the organization.
More and more the AR zombies demanded that I express gratitude to ES and AR. Every paper that a student wrote had to end with the obligatory "I am so grateful to ES and AR for..." along with "I deeply regret that I have met this great knowledge with contempt..."
Eli Siegel was an evil person. And I don't use the word evil lightly.
How do you decide which side is telling the truth? I think that would be the side willing to stand behind what he says. Since 2005 I've had an open offer to debate the Aesthetic Realists publicly in a formal format at any time to defend what I've said on this site, and to answer their own charges against me. But the AR people won't do it. Their excuse is, "He's not worth debating." But if that's true, then why did they put up a ninety-six page website to try to snipe at me and to try to rebut what I'm saying? I think the answer is that they're content to hide behind the cover of the Internet, but they know how bad they'd look in a live format where anyone actually got to ask any pointed questions.
You know what's really funny? Someone went to one of their public presentations, said he'd seen this site, and asked about the cult allegations. The AR person said, "It's very easy to say crap like that on the Internet and never have to be challenged." Oh, the irony is killing me!
Anyway, Aesthetic Realists, as for a public debate, I'm ready when you are. And to everyone else, when the AR people won't stand behind what they're saying, why should anyone take what they say seriously?
Want to know when I update this site?
Get on our list and I'll let you know when I have new stuff.
And of course, your address is confidential.
The current AR members who troll this site are welcome to sign up too.